Go Back   UPNetwork > General Forums > UPNetwork

Closed Thread
Thread Tools
Old 04-16-2017, 11:05 AM   #51
Dance till you're dead~
Whimsy's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Literally everywhere
Posts: 1,886
Send a message via Skype™ to Whimsy
Spoiler: show

Spoiler: show
Fizzy Bubbles Profile/Whimlist/ASB/Wild Future
Inactive Ref, laziness op~

Originally Posted by Lost™ View Post
In Mother 3 Swampy was Flint and you were Hinawa. You two were a wonderful couple. Icarus was your dog, and Toy and I were your twin sons. Well, until a dinosaur impaled you through the heart. So yes, where is he!?
Originally Posted by Red Panda View Post

Whimsy is offline  
Old 04-16-2017, 12:08 PM   #52
Problematic Fave
Shuckle's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: VA
Posts: 3,198
Originally Posted by Doppleganger View Post
Yes, it is.

If you commit murder twice in your life, using the first murder as an excuse to make the second murder's sentence longer is double jeopardy. Because you are applying the second sentence's conviction + interest from the first, which is, in fact, further punishing the original sentence. You can't do that.
what the fuck NO this isn't how it works in real life!

Double Jeopardy means that if you are ACQUITTED, you cannot be tried again for the same crime if new evidence emerges.

"If the glove doesn't fit, you must acquit." Jury acquits.

Someone finds evidence that proves OJ guilty. Can you try him again? No. Because that would be double jeopardy.

Double Jeopardy does NOT mean that if you are tried and found guilty of a crime, and then you get out of prison and commit the crime again, that you can't do anything special about the new crime. That is Grade A Stupid. If you're still murdering people after 20 years in prison for murdering people....MAYBE? YOU SHOULD BE IN JAIL FOR A LITTLE LONGER?
Shuckle is offline  
Old 04-16-2017, 12:20 PM   #53
Foot, meet mouth.
Rangeet's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Beyond the Wall
Posts: 4,357
Send a message via MSN to Rangeet Send a message via Skype™ to Rangeet
Dopple's point of view is actually not exactly original. Not that I really agree, just saying.
Spoiler: show
Rangeet is offline  
Old 04-16-2017, 03:19 PM   #54
Talon87's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Lafayette, Indiana
Posts: 20,548
Originally Posted by Rangeet View Post
Dopple's point of view is actually not exactly original. Not that I really agree, just saying.
And from the opening text of that very essay:
"One of the most common reasons for a sentencing enhancement is that the defendant has a prior conviction."
I can't stress this enough. It isn't only something that happens, it's something that happens regularly.

Continuing, the essayists write:
"Courts have rejected claims that these recidivism enhancements violate the prohibition against double jeopardy. They have explained that the Double Jeopardy Clause does not prohibit the legislature from authorizing multiple punishments for one offense and that, in any event, the Double Jeopardy Clause does not apply at sentencing."
Case. closed.

We can debate the morality and the philosophy all we like, but as far as "Did Talon have the right understanding or did Doppel?", we're fucking done here.

Originally Posted by Talon87 View Post
How can you say, "This doesn't happen in real courts" when prior convictions is 100% a thing that the courts look at when deciding how to sentence someone? "I didn't say sentencing, I said conviction" you might say ... but that's the thing: if you're going to focus on convicting rather than sentencing then you've improperly responded to MtG to begin with. MtG's quoted paragraph is totally describing sentencing here (an escalation of punishment meted out in response to a current offense and in light of prior offenses), not conviction (determining a party's innocence or guilt in some matter).
Originally Posted by Talon87 View Post
"Double jeopardy" is being tried for the exact same instance of a crime twice. "Double jeopardy" is not being tried for the same general crime twice, nor is it what you've quoted me discussing -- which was judges using a person's prior convictions, or "priors", to determine appropriate sentencing.
Done. Done, done, done, done, done. Debate the ethics of this convention all you like. Join with the essayists and argue that the courts have got it all wrong, that we need to seriously rethink our criminal justice system. But I think I am at the very least owed a simple acknowledgement that my interpretation of how the law is carried out was, for at least some if not for most U.S. jurisdictions, correct.
Talon87 is offline  
Old 04-16-2017, 04:59 PM   #55
Activating Rampage
Chalis's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,961

"Meteor Jam!"

Chalis is offline  
Old 04-16-2017, 05:12 PM   #56
League President
Zelphon's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: The Sniz Mobile
Posts: 2,336
Send a message via Skype™ to Zelphon
Life, but a series of paths and flows
Down many one can go
May yours run smoothly and be soft to your feet

Zelphon is online now  
Old 04-16-2017, 05:14 PM   #57
Jerichi's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: 蒸気の波の中
Posts: 14,765
Okay we've strayed waaaaay off topic at this point. I'm just going to close this for now. If you feel like debating the ethics of rule enforcement on a Pokémon Internet forum, please take it to the appropriate subforum.

私のことを消して本気で愛さないで 恋なんてただのゲーム 楽しめばそれでいい
閉ざした心を飾る 派手なドレスも靴も 孤独の友達


Jerichi is offline  
Closed Thread

Lower Navigation
Go Back   UPNetwork > General Forums > UPNetwork

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:14 PM.

Design By: Miner Skinz.com
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.