UPNetwork  

Go Back   UPNetwork > General Forums > Debate

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-19-2018, 11:44 AM   #801
Concept
Archbishop of Banterbury
 
Concept's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Nipple-Hunting with Elsie and Kairne
Posts: 7,030
Send a message via Skype™ to Concept
The Royal family is an affront to any notion of meritocratic or democratic society and annoys the shit out of me. They're also the most pragmatic way of choosing a head of state.

Compare the involvement of the royal family in day to day politics with that of almost any President on the planet. Comparatively, they do very little. Now compare their on paper powers with those of most western Presidents. On paper they have more power than most western Presidents. Why then do they exercise less? Because how much power they can exercise in reality depends far more on public perception than on what the law says. US presidents of both parties have been routinely overstepped their constitutional bounds for decades. Meanwhile the monarchy has powers they haven't used in hudlndreds of years (see the veto, unused in over 300 years).

The US (and other nations) presidents get away with overstepping their bounds because public perception is that they're the highest, legitimate authority in the country. Meanwhile as long as the monarchies powers are viewed as illegitimate - because they're undemocratic - any attempt to use them will fail, except in a true emergency (think their ability to call an election in the event the government attempts to suspend elections, for example) in which case they provide a single, centralised and non politically aligned backstop against abuses of the system by career politicians.

In short, having a single head of state with emergency powers is very useful in the event of serioua political abuse of power, and the single best way to keep that head of state from abusing their power is to make sure it seems illegitimate for them to use it except in emergencies. Public perception of what they should be able to do will win out over on paper laws any day, and in the case of elected head of states his imbues one person with dangerous amounts of power regardless of how much you try to curtail it with laws.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by PTerry
What can the harvest hope for, if not the care of the reaper man?
Concept is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2018, 12:31 AM   #802
Doppleganger
我が名は勇者王!
 
Doppleganger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Emina Isle
Posts: 14,194
Send a message via AIM to Doppleganger
Hey, props to you Concept, that's the kind of unique kingdom insight a closed-minded individual like myself wouldn't have imagined otherwise.

@AK2: I think humans, innately, desire some kind of royalty. You wouldn't imagine the number of people who crave the idea of "American Royalty" who flaunt wealth and power. They even coined the term "imperial presidency" to term how a president should act. Nothing annoys a poor person more than a rich person looking/acting poor. To them it's like, "you have all the advantages and are telling me my life is better bugger off".

I don't care for it though.
__________________
あなたの勇気が切り開く未来
ふたりの想いが見つけだす希望
今 信じあえる
あきらめない 心かさね
永遠を抱きしめて
Doppleganger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2018, 06:10 PM   #803
Concept
Archbishop of Banterbury
 
Concept's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Nipple-Hunting with Elsie and Kairne
Posts: 7,030
Send a message via Skype™ to Concept
See also my views on having an unelected second chamber - democratically I find it offensive, but in practical terms much more useful than having two elected chambers (pretty sure I had an argument with Kush about it in this very thread).
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by PTerry
What can the harvest hope for, if not the care of the reaper man?
Concept is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2018, 12:03 AM   #804
Doppleganger
我が名は勇者王!
 
Doppleganger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Emina Isle
Posts: 14,194
Send a message via AIM to Doppleganger
It's the opposite with the US. The origins of the House and Senate were as a compromise between those who wanted proportional representation and equal representation, believing that two houses would act as a gatekeeper to prevent one state's interest from influencing the whole of US politics. In the early days of the US the House was where most of the action was, but after the first World War its impact has fallen considerably.

Why? Well before telecommunications expanded, you knew your Congressman because he was local and was an access point to Washington DC. But in places like California where population density has ballooned and the minutes in a workday stayed static, the relationship between a county and its congressmen is about as interpersonal as between one of the senators. Add that to the two year cycle and most people can't even name their local rep, with the position having very low prestige and influence nationally.

Post-telephone, the desire for singular celebrity figures magnified the power of the president and senators. With television, you feel closer to the president than the local congressman you never see on national TV. So the House, which was historically cohesive and more in-line with what democracy should ideally represent, is now a chaotic, disjointed mess that only serves as a checkpoint for policy. It can't effectively introduce policy or find agreement on changes that the senate would also accept. And hence, American politics has been kinda sorta spinning its wheels for the past 30 years on many domestic issues.

Though, that goes for a lot of things. For almost 100 years, before the industrial revolution and the era of imperialism, the US was pretty devoted to its democratic ideal. It's moved away from that toward a more authoritarian approach to the present day.
__________________
あなたの勇気が切り開く未来
ふたりの想いが見つけだす希望
今 信じあえる
あきらめない 心かさね
永遠を抱きしめて
Doppleganger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2019, 08:27 AM   #805
Doppleganger
我が名は勇者王!
 
Doppleganger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Emina Isle
Posts: 14,194
Send a message via AIM to Doppleganger
What's going on in Britannia lately?! Aren't we due to exit the EU in two months time? Why all the new bluster about staying in?
__________________
あなたの勇気が切り開く未来
ふたりの想いが見つけだす希望
今 信じあえる
あきらめない 心かさね
永遠を抱きしめて
Doppleganger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2019, 12:04 PM   #806
Raves
a quick fly cuppa
 
Raves's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Life and love make fools of us all. Gods reject the existence of love and life.
Posts: 2,452
Send a message via Skype™ to Raves
The long and short of it is that May has predictably fucked up and people are pissed about it.

edit: ahahahaha okay remember when I said May predictably fucked up?

yeah that was an understatement and a half. Her Brexit plan hasn't been thrown out so much as tossed into a wood chipper and set on fire.
__________________
Stale Water.

Unruly Premonition.

Last edited by Raves; 01-15-2019 at 04:45 PM.
Raves is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2019, 02:53 PM   #807
Concept
Archbishop of Banterbury
 
Concept's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Nipple-Hunting with Elsie and Kairne
Posts: 7,030
Send a message via Skype™ to Concept
Basically our government is where Americans should look right now to feel better about themselves.

The past two years of negotiations have only been about the terms we leave on, not the terms of any future agreements between ourselves and the EU. What they've basically come up with is;

-A transition period extending until the end of 2020 during which time we'll continue to abide by a bunch of EU regulations whilst we negotiate our future relationship without any representation or say in the EU changing those regulations.
-We'll pay those contributions to the EU budget we've already committed to.
-The Irish backstop - in the event that we fail to agree a way to keep the Irish border a soft border (no customs checks etc - it's a major part of the Good Friday agreement that bought peace to Northern Ireland) then NI will continue to operate under EU regulations indefinitely to ensure there's no need to check goods going one way or another over the border.

Now no-one is very happy with this deal and it was defeated in the commons 432-202 in the biggest single defeat for a piece of UK government legislation ever. Whilst the Conservatives are the largest single party in parliament, because we have minor parties that actually matter they don't wield a majority on their own. They currently rely on small party of Northern Irish nationalists in the DUP who are strongly opposed to the Irish backstop, and even within the Conservative party there are both anti- and pro-EU factions who both hate this deal for various reasons (the anti-EU side believes we're giving too much up, the pro-EU side believes we're shooting ourselves in the foot in our haste to get out). These factions are both pretty strong and can't agree on anything except that they hate the current deal on the table, and having to pander to both prevents the Conservatives from achieving anything.

So far still with me? Ok. So after this deal failed to clear parliament, Labour (currently our second largest party) tabled a vote of no confidence in the government which would, if passed, force a new government and almost certainly a general election. Unfortunately you just found the only other thing the warring Conservative factions actually agree on - they should absolutely not risk a general election giving the other guys a chance at power. The DUP decided that despite voting against the deal they would honour their current "confidence and supply) arrangement with the Conservatives (a deal whereby they agree to vote with the government on confidence votes and budgets in exchange for huge funding for Northern Ireland), so the government actually won the confidence vote 326-305 thereby preventing an early election (our next one isn't scheduled until 2022 in the normal course of things).

Hence, massive paralysis. Unfortunately paralysis isn't even the worst of our problems right now. The one piece of Brexit legislation we've managed to get through is the one that says we are definitely leaving regardless at the end of March. Even if parliament overturned this (unlikely in and of itself, given the current gridlock) the remaining 27 EU countries would all have to individually agree to any extension because this date is also set by Article 50 (the means by which countries leave the EU, setting a two year deadline from when it's activated). They're not super keen on doing so because a) it'd make the upcoming EU parliament elections in May super complicated if they moved our leaving date to a few months after they happen and b) they're largely tired of pandering to the child in a corner who can't decide what it even wants and have had two years of their time wasted by us already. The highest EU court has said we can unilaterally retract Article 50 entirely (and therefore decide we're not leaving at all) without the EU's say so though, but doing so is probably political suicide.

Now what does it look like if we reach the end of March with no deal agreed? Well, most policy decisions made by UK governments for ~40 years have rested on the assumption of certain realities of EU membership. This ranges from things like the agreements which allow any and all flights between the UK and EU countries, every single trade deal we're currently part of and basically everything about goods coming into the country. The flights thing probably jumps out at you there but what should really scare people is the Dover-Calais crossing. As it turns out we're a small, overpopulated island that gets the majority of its food, medicine, all of the chemicals we use to provide safe drinking water and god knows what else over crossings with the EU because it's the only remotely close landmass. Who knew? Not the guy who was in charge of negotiations with the EU, apparently. Right now as an EU member state we're part of the customs union so there are no customs checks at any of these points. In the event of a no-deal situation I refer you to above article for concerns about how long it would take to process an individual truck, and to this one for the fun fact that about 2.6m trucks cross just one of our major links with the EU every year. Predictions on times for trucks sat waiting on the 14 mile stretch of motorway being prepared as a lorry park range from several days to several weeks. Many with food in them. Which will totally keep in the back of a truck that long.

Tl;dr, we've failed to unseat our current government early, our government has failed to pass any kind of deal and in the event of a no-deal our country is about to hit the point where we can't get food, chemicals to provide clean water and medicine into the country fast enough to meet demand in about ten weeks time. Existing supplies will stretch that time frame a bit, but we're talking weeks there.

I would actually take Trump as President and a government shutdown in preference right now.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by PTerry
What can the harvest hope for, if not the care of the reaper man?

Last edited by Concept; 01-17-2019 at 03:02 PM.
Concept is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2019, 03:21 PM   #808
Lady Kuno
The hostess with the mostess
 
Lady Kuno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 226,521
Yeah you guys are seriously fucked. As much as I hate to say it, no-deal is what's likely to happen as your shit politicians only care about themselves.
__________________
JUST NUKE THE FUCKING SUN


PROUD OWNER OF A MISSINGNO. IN FIZZY BUBBLES
Lady Kuno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2019, 03:29 PM   #809
Concept
Archbishop of Banterbury
 
Concept's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Nipple-Hunting with Elsie and Kairne
Posts: 7,030
Send a message via Skype™ to Concept
Part of me still doesn't quite believe we've reached the point where government ministers have begun seriously and publically talking about the need to stockpile food and medicine in case of no-deal, and another part of me despairs that they've only begun thinking about that in the past few weeks.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by PTerry
What can the harvest hope for, if not the care of the reaper man?
Concept is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2019, 04:08 PM   #810
Concept
Archbishop of Banterbury
 
Concept's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Nipple-Hunting with Elsie and Kairne
Posts: 7,030
Send a message via Skype™ to Concept
For those interested; as it stands we're still leaving next Friday with no deal currently in place (although the EU27 are as we speak debating our request for a short extension of 2-3 months or so but the mood seems to be that there's no point in granting an extension unless we can guarantee a different outcome to what we'd get now). Any one of the EU27 could veto the request. In the meantime May channeled her inner Trump by giving a speech blaming MPs for her personal failure to make any kind of attempt to find a consensus in parliament and trying to align herself with "the people" against them, which is totally how a responsible adult acts at a time when MPs are already receiving death threats and one was murdered by a right wing terrorist just a few years ago.

EDIT the first: Assuming the Speaker allows her to bring it back for a third time, I suspect May will get her deal passed now. The EU has agreed an extension to the 22nd of May conditional on the deal passing parliament (to give us time to pass all the technical bits required to make it work), but only until 12th April if it doesn't. With the EU having set out their stall now I suspect that the anti-no deal majority will be cowed into voting for her deal for fear of a no deal. They might force some amendments to it though relating either to calling a general election or to dictate the next phase of negotiations (the deal only covers the terms of our exit and creates a transitional period, it says nothing about what our longterm relationship with the EU will look like).
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by PTerry
What can the harvest hope for, if not the care of the reaper man?

Last edited by Concept; 03-21-2019 at 07:01 PM.
Concept is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2019, 08:51 AM   #811
Raves
a quick fly cuppa
 
Raves's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Life and love make fools of us all. Gods reject the existence of love and life.
Posts: 2,452
Send a message via Skype™ to Raves
Theresa May's going, going, gone June 7th.

imho should have been gone much earlier.
__________________
Stale Water.

Unruly Premonition.
Raves is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2019, 08:32 PM   #812
Doppleganger
我が名は勇者王!
 
Doppleganger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Emina Isle
Posts: 14,194
Send a message via AIM to Doppleganger
So what happens now? Another referendum on Brexit?
__________________
あなたの勇気が切り開く未来
ふたりの想いが見つけだす希望
今 信じあえる
あきらめない 心かさね
永遠を抱きしめて
Doppleganger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2019, 11:38 AM   #813
Raves
a quick fly cuppa
 
Raves's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Life and love make fools of us all. Gods reject the existence of love and life.
Posts: 2,452
Send a message via Skype™ to Raves
Honestly I don't have a fucking clue.

There's the threat of Boris Johnson being her successor, at which point we know this country's completely fucked beyond repair.
__________________
Stale Water.

Unruly Premonition.
Raves is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2019, 05:29 PM   #814
Concept
Archbishop of Banterbury
 
Concept's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Nipple-Hunting with Elsie and Kairne
Posts: 7,030
Send a message via Skype™ to Concept
Tory MPs vote amongst themselves for a successor to the Tory leadership, and the top two candidates get voted on by the wider Tory membership across the country. Winner becomes leader of the party. Winner almost certainly becomes PM too, although that's contingent upon them being able to command the confidence of the house of commons (where the Tories do not quite hold a majority, so they're currently reliant on the DUP for support, and if the winner is too divisive amongst Tory MPs it's possible some of them will refuse to support the new Tory leader as PM). Most likely outcome is that the new Tory leader is also the new PM, but that's not 100% guaranteed.

Assuming the most likely outcome happens and the next Tory leader also becomes PM at the same time, they inherit the same problems May had; there's no majority in parliament for any given outcome on Brexit. so there's complete paralysis. May was a PR nightmare but there's no reason to believe anyone else could've done any better. Even if a new Tory leader is more willing to compromise with Labour, the Labour party can't even agree amongst themselves what they actually want and so many Tories would oppose any compromise with Labour that it's entirely possible for the two main party leaderships to agree a compromise Brexit strategy between them and still see it defeated in the commons.

I'm in no way sad the Maybot is finally being decommissioned but realistically things will be no different with someone else.

A customs union might stand a chance at passing parliament - when Ken Clarke put forward an amendment to that effect earlier this year it was only defeated by three votes, and a number of those voting against are adamantly against a no deal Brexit and might cave on the matter as we run up on the October deadline - but no guarantee. Hell if BoJo gets in he could simply stop bringing Brexit legislation forward and let the clock run out.

EDIT the first: Also worth noting that May steps aside as Conservative party leader on June 7th; to my understanding she remains Prime Minister until a new one is agreed (much like how Brown remained PM for 5 days after losing the 2010 general election until it became clear Cameron and Clegg could agree a deal to reach a majority in the commons). The contest is expected to last until late July.

EDIT the second: Oh and we also had european elections on Thursday. We're expecting results tomorrow or Monday I think because the last EU nations voted today. The Brexit Party (pro no-deal extremists) are expected to send the largest single British contingent on a vote percentage in the mid-30's by virtue of having no specific policies and Farage as a leader. I voted Green on the basis they're unambiguously pro-Remain and pro-environmental regulation. They have way too many barmy ideas on things like education for me to ever vote for them on a national level (the Lib Dems and Labour generally have a much better put together if less radical and interesting national agenda) but in terms of the sort of things the EU parliament regulates I'm quite fond of them.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by PTerry
What can the harvest hope for, if not the care of the reaper man?

Last edited by Concept; 05-25-2019 at 05:59 PM.
Concept is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2019, 04:44 AM   #815
Concept
Archbishop of Banterbury
 
Concept's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Nipple-Hunting with Elsie and Kairne
Posts: 7,030
Send a message via Skype™ to Concept
Northern Ireland and Scotland are yet to be counted, but it looks pretty much like a tie up between Remain and Leave votes. The few Tory and Labour voters are hard to lump into one camp or the other given how much of a mess both parties are on the issue; the obvious pro-Leave parties (Ukip and Brexit) are combined polling at 36.8%, whilst the unambiguous Remain parties (Lib Dem, Green and Change UK) are combined 37.2%. Seems likely that once NI and particularly Scotland are counted, Remain parties will collectively be a few points ahead but not enough in it to really call it. Tories beaten into fifth place. Labour narrowly in third ahead of the Greens in fourth, but they could easily switch places after Scotland declares (where the Greens usually hold up well but the SNP have all but cleaned up the former Labour vote). Our two main parties of government for the last century beaten into fifth and third/fourth place is kid of funny, even allowing for how the EU elections are always a place for protest voting.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by PTerry
What can the harvest hope for, if not the care of the reaper man?
Concept is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2019, 09:23 AM   #816
Ironthunder
The Uncultured One
 
Ironthunder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Somewhere.
Posts: 3,555
Send a message via Skype™ to Ironthunder
tbh after the entire shambles of Brexit thus far, most everything since the vote has landed squarely on the Conservatives' doorstep, it's absolutely no surprise they've collapsed. Add in May's resignation and the actual freak show stepping up to try and steal top spot (Hunt, Gove, Boris and a few others)... It's unsurprising nobody wants to back them.
__________________
Ironthunder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2019, 02:09 PM   #817
Doppleganger
我が名は勇者王!
 
Doppleganger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Emina Isle
Posts: 14,194
Send a message via AIM to Doppleganger
Why would Boris take the job now? Wasn't he cowering at the thought 3 years ago?
__________________
あなたの勇気が切り開く未来
ふたりの想いが見つけだす希望
今 信じあえる
あきらめない 心かさね
永遠を抱きしめて
Doppleganger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2019, 04:01 PM   #818
Concept
Archbishop of Banterbury
 
Concept's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Nipple-Hunting with Elsie and Kairne
Posts: 7,030
Send a message via Skype™ to Concept
Boris wanted it three years ago but one of his main allies at the time gave a speech announcing his own candidacy a couple of hours before Boris was due to announce he was running. The speech was widely seen as a take that at BoJo, and he ended up not running because of it.

If Boris makes it to the run off put to the Tory membership he'll probably win, but enough MPs hate him that he might well not make it past the first round. A number of senior Tories have made it clear they won't support him even if he becomes leader.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by PTerry
What can the harvest hope for, if not the care of the reaper man?
Concept is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2019, 03:19 PM   #819
Raves
a quick fly cuppa
 
Raves's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Life and love make fools of us all. Gods reject the existence of love and life.
Posts: 2,452
Send a message via Skype™ to Raves
So the race to the next PM is between the clown and the cunt.

Whoever wins, we lose.
__________________
Stale Water.

Unruly Premonition.
Raves is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2019, 05:55 AM   #820
Concept
Archbishop of Banterbury
 
Concept's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Nipple-Hunting with Elsie and Kairne
Posts: 7,030
Send a message via Skype™ to Concept
I mean, all the options were Tories. It couldn't really have been much less terrible.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by PTerry
What can the harvest hope for, if not the care of the reaper man?
Concept is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2019, 06:39 AM   #821
Raves
a quick fly cuppa
 
Raves's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Life and love make fools of us all. Gods reject the existence of love and life.
Posts: 2,452
Send a message via Skype™ to Raves
Boris Johnson is Prime Minister.

We are completely fucked.
__________________
Stale Water.

Unruly Premonition.
Raves is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2019, 08:05 AM   #822
Doppleganger
我が名は勇者王!
 
Doppleganger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Emina Isle
Posts: 14,194
Send a message via AIM to Doppleganger
Bojock Unleashed!

God save the Queen

And maybe the Brexit deal, too.
__________________
あなたの勇気が切り開く未来
ふたりの想いが見つけだす希望
今 信じあえる
あきらめない 心かさね
永遠を抱きしめて
Doppleganger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2019, 03:54 AM   #823
Doppleganger
我が名は勇者王!
 
Doppleganger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Emina Isle
Posts: 14,194
Send a message via AIM to Doppleganger
I think Concept was the one who talked about the difference between de jure and de facto powers in the UK: the Royals have a lot of power on paper but can't act on it due to the perception that their actions would be illegitimate.

It seems what happened when Bojo suspended Parliament is the same thing, and it's being challenged in court. So is the UK still on track to withdraw with no deal?
__________________
あなたの勇気が切り開く未来
ふたりの想いが見つけだす希望
今 信じあえる
あきらめない 心かさね
永遠を抱きしめて
Doppleganger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2019, 05:56 AM   #824
Concept
Archbishop of Banterbury
 
Concept's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Nipple-Hunting with Elsie and Kairne
Posts: 7,030
Send a message via Skype™ to Concept
The parliamentary prorougation thing is a bit silly. Johnsons argument is twofold - one, that parliament suspends for a little while around this time every year anyway for party conference season, he's merely extending it slightly (which is true) and that this is the longest parliamentary session for ages and it's pretty typical for a new executive to start a new parliamentary session upon taking office (also true). His argument falls apart because the conference season suspension is up to the legislature, not the executive - the vote is usually a formality but it wasn't impossible the Commons would decide not to this year. Prorogation betwen parliamentary sessions is also normally a handful of days, not weeks. The legal argument is that formally the Queen suspends parliament "on the prime ministers advice" and that did Johnson lie to the Queen about his reasons for suspension. What's emerged in recent days though is that even if the Supreme Court rules his initial suspension unlawful, it might be reluctant to politicise itself further by demanding he recall parliament. In other words he might lose the case and stil get away with the full suspension he wanted.

As for no deal; a few weeks ago parliament passed the Benn Act which makes it law for the Prime Minister to have to request the EU an extension to the Brexit deadline until 31st January in the event we haven't agreed and ratified a deal by October 19th so in theory we've pushed the cliff edge further back. Whilst Johnson has dodged questions about whether he'd go so far as to break the law, he's said repeatedly he has no intention of getting an extension but given no real clue as to how he'd do that without breaking the law.

On a political level Johnson has staked his ground on delivering Brexit by 31st October (the current no deal deadline) in an effort to win back voters from the Brexit party - his calculation is that many traditional Tory voters are pretty unwilling to vote elsewhere even if he does something catastrophically stupid like no deal, and winning votes from the Brexit party is worth it. Current polling puts the Tories 8-10% ahead of Labour (albeit still at risk of not winning a majority) so this strategy seems to be working for him to an extent. Bear in mind this is a man who wrote articles both in favour and against Brexit before commiting - he gives no shits about the whole thing, his only concern is that he wins elections. After the Benn Act passed he tried to call an election in the hopes that the combined leave vote would be enough to win him a majority over a disunited opposition. However an early election (before the set 5 year date, not up until May 2022) requires a supermajority of parliament and the opposition refused to vote for it because they want Johnson to either have to choose to between breaking the law - with the attendant risk of prosecution, removal from office and jail time - and requesting an extension that would send a huge chunk of his supporters to vote for the Brexit Party instead of the Tories in a November election. Meanwhile Labour continues to equivocate because it can't agree internally what it wants (the New Labour vs Corbyn arguements they've been having for years now) and the Lib Dems have sought to supplant them as the main anti-Tory opposition by pledging to revoke article 50 and cancel Brexit entirely if they win a majority (lol) in a hypothetical election. While there's no chance of a Lib Dem majority, their attempt to outflank Labour might have some legs.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by PTerry
What can the harvest hope for, if not the care of the reaper man?

Last edited by Concept; 09-22-2019 at 06:05 AM.
Concept is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2019, 05:29 AM   #825
Concept
Archbishop of Banterbury
 
Concept's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Nipple-Hunting with Elsie and Kairne
Posts: 7,030
Send a message via Skype™ to Concept
Supreme Court unanimously rules the prorogation unlawful, and further rules that "It is for parliament, and in particular the Speaker and the Lord Speaker to decide what to do next. Unless there is some parliamentary rule of which we are unaware, they can take immediate steps to enable each house to meet as soon as possible. It is not clear to us that any step is needed from the prime minister, but if it is, the court is pleased that his counsel have told the court that he will take all necessary steps to comply with the terms of any declaration made by this court." (direct quote). In other words, the Speaker (who's ben quite vocally against prorogation) can now recall parliament without the Prime Ministers involvement.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by PTerry
What can the harvest hope for, if not the care of the reaper man?
Concept is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Lower Navigation
Go Back   UPNetwork > General Forums > Debate


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:54 AM.


Design By: Miner Skinz.com
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.