10-23-2012, 02:34 PM | #1426 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 14,729
|
Interesting that Obama is losing a little ground. Could be a close one
|
10-23-2012, 04:45 PM | #1427 |
Banned
|
I'm betting on a landslide.
It seems Romney's strategy was not to win the debate but to win voters. His plan was to look presidential and capable to the swing voters, presenting himself as a viable alternative to Obama. A calm, strong, knowledgeable, and resolved Leader. Whereas Obama was trying to incite a self-implosion on Romney's part, but the bait wasn't taken. In the end he just looked desperate and condescending. Not exactly someone on top of his game. |
10-23-2012, 04:58 PM | #1428 |
Fog Badge
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,513
|
A landslide for Obama, I agree.
|
10-23-2012, 05:46 PM | #1429 |
プラスチック♡ラブ
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: 蒸気の波の中
Posts: 14,766
|
Since Economy is one of the big tipping points of this election, let's dispel some myths about the National Debt, courtesy of John Green.
|
10-23-2012, 06:42 PM | #1430 |
Fog Badge
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,513
|
__________________
|
10-23-2012, 07:45 PM | #1431 |
Banned
|
How can you keep deluding yourself?
Obama's been losing ground since the debates, his caricatures of Romney have blown up in his face, and he's not just behind in the polls, but he's already conceding states! His administration is ridden with scandals, his term riddled with broken promises, the economy sucks worse than when he took office, and his signature legislation (Obamacare) is something the majority of Americans reject. Prospects do not look good for him, no matter how you look at it. Even if he were to win, which is becoming less and less likely everyday, it would be barely neck and neck. I don't know what world you're living in, but it's certainly not reality. Well, you'll wake up soon enough after the Election. |
10-23-2012, 07:52 PM | #1432 | |
Fog Badge
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,513
|
Quote:
But it's okay, he fulfills the White Horse Prophecy and will be doing it in part under the Oath of Vengeance. Right, UM?
__________________
Last edited by deoxys; 10-23-2012 at 07:55 PM. |
|
10-23-2012, 08:12 PM | #1433 |
Fog Badge
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,513
|
Third Party Debate Live |
10-23-2012, 08:48 PM | #1434 | ||||
Banned
|
Quote:
That news story links to here as a source, which then links to here. Besides the fact that the source website is obviously liberal/Democrat biased, both of those stories are written by the same 2 people, a particular Bob Fitrakis and Harvey Wasserman. Both of which are essentially no-names on the site, with only one accomplishment to their name, a for-sale E-book called "Will the GOP Steal America's 2012 Election?" Further investigation into the authors gives me this to say: Quote:
Harvey Wasserman is a little less interesting of a figure, being mostly a major proponent of green energy, and anti-nuclear (an obvious democrat). I'm not about to spend money on their E-book, so this is about as far as the investigation can go, I can't verify their claims (how convenient for them), but, a Socialist Party Founder? Definitely suspicious credentials there, makes their claim far less believable. But, if Romney does plan on owning Voting machines in swing states, who owns voting machines in the rest of the states, and why is that not also an issue? Besides the fact that Democrats are notorious for election fraud. Quote:
Quote:
Who knows. There's still Daniel's vision, also seen by Esdras in the Apocrypha, that's currently in the works, and unfinished yet. Last edited by unownmew; 10-23-2012 at 09:05 PM. |
||||
10-23-2012, 08:51 PM | #1435 |
Cascade Badge
|
|
10-23-2012, 08:56 PM | #1436 |
プラスチック♡ラブ
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: 蒸気の波の中
Posts: 14,766
|
>Besides the fact that Democrats are notorious for election fraud.
C'mon, um, you're really just not trying anymore. At least try to back up your demonizing generalizations with some fact. |
10-23-2012, 09:07 PM | #1437 |
Fog Badge
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,513
|
I like the part where he didn't even address the White Horse Prophecy and the Oath of Vengeance that Mormons believe R-Money will fulfill (though they'll tell you otherwise). lol
|
10-23-2012, 09:11 PM | #1438 | |
Banned
|
Quote:
Speaking of Acorn. Obama's a big bundler of theirs. Last edited by unownmew; 10-23-2012 at 09:16 PM. |
|
10-23-2012, 09:17 PM | #1439 |
プラスチック♡ラブ
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: 蒸気の波の中
Posts: 14,766
|
Let's just totally moot your whole argument by showing that there is practically no voter fraud in the US that it's just a scaretactic used by politicians to attempt to invalidate each other.
|
10-23-2012, 09:21 PM | #1440 |
Banned
|
Love how you completely ignore the point.
|
10-23-2012, 09:22 PM | #1441 |
Barghest Barghest Barghe-
|
lol no. He is addressing the point BEHIND your point. If there is practically no voter fraud, then, there is not enough fraud to prove that the Democrats are dirty election swingers.
__________________
|
10-23-2012, 09:26 PM | #1442 | |
Banned
|
Quote:
Also, Acorn. |
|
10-23-2012, 09:29 PM | #1443 |
プラスチック♡ラブ
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: 蒸気の波の中
Posts: 14,766
|
I am not ignoring your point. You have no point.
You really can't make any claims about anyone doing anything to swing elections when it really just doesn't happen. If there's some mysterious body conducting voter fraud en masse, we sure as hell don't see it, nor has it influenced any election enough to be a problem. So do your research before you spout off your rebuttals. >Acorn Oh boy I knew you'd bring that up. Here, read this. |
10-23-2012, 09:30 PM | #1444 | |
Barghest Barghest Barghe-
|
Quote:
Don't use hypothetical. I could say that only 1/4 of all murders are properly documented. Could you prove me wrong? No. Because the other 3/4 have not been documented. You have to go by confirmed numbers, otherwise, nothing either Obama or Romney say can be proven. So, nice try, but, no really.
__________________
|
|
10-23-2012, 09:37 PM | #1445 |
プラスチック♡ラブ
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: 蒸気の波の中
Posts: 14,766
|
Oh and in my like 5 minutes of research, pretty much all the "voter fraud" committed by ACORN was voter registration fraud, which is a completely different thing from actually casting a ballot. This kind of thing happens all the time and while illegal is pretty much harmless in and of itself.
Is it really that hard for you to google "impact of ACORN voter fraud" and find this all out for yourself? Basing your opinions on a four-year-old media blitz is really, really poor form. But you're a wildly stubborn megalomaniac so I don't know why I'm even debating with you. Pretty much everyone on this forum will agree with me so it's not like I'm really getting anything out of proving you wrong, since you'll just brush it off and act like you're totally right regardless. Enjoy your ignorance, I guess. |
10-24-2012, 05:42 AM | #1446 |
Cascade Badge
|
I'm proud and ashamed, Every 4th of July, You've got to know the truth Before you say that you've got pride~ <3 |
10-24-2012, 09:59 AM | #1447 | |||||
Banned
|
Quote:
You're trying to disprove something I never said. -.- I said they were notorious for voter fraud, meaning, they do it, and everyone knows that do it, I never made a claim either way about whether that fraud amounted to anything. Quote:
There is no way you can logically say that "Democrats do not engage in voter fraud," by saying "any and all voter fraud that occurs doesn't impact anything." You are by admission, agreeing with my point, but trying to downplay it by saying "oh, it's ok that they do this, because it doesn't impact anything anyway." Whether it impacts anything is beside the point and you know it. That's not what I was saying. Quote:
Quote:
Instead, He's trying to set up a strawman or some sort of semantic argument where disagreeing with him means I support the opposite of his position, which is entirely not the case. I support the position of there being no verifiable position, and thus his argument, which attempts to set up a verifiable position is invalid. Quote:
|
|||||
10-24-2012, 10:11 AM | #1448 | ||
Banned
|
Quote:
Quote:
Now stop putting words in my mouth and start reading what I actually type. |
||
10-24-2012, 12:44 PM | #1449 |
Double Dragon
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 3,776
|
Just saw an interesting graphic. It appears that most of the rest of the world would rather have Obama than Romney as president. Of course, I'm sure many of the people "prefer" Obama because they actually know who he is, instead of Romney, whom they know almost nothing about. Still, interesting to see, I think.
__________________
|
10-24-2012, 12:55 PM | #1450 | |
時の彼方へ
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Lafayette, Indiana
Posts: 20,578
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
Lower Navigation | ||||||
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
|
|