08-24-2012, 07:47 PM | #1 |
Fog Badge
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,513
|
Apple v. Samsung: Samsung loses, Jury Awards Apple $1,051,855,000
In other news, the US Patent system is broken.
__________________
|
08-24-2012, 07:49 PM | #2 |
Primordial Fishbeast
|
Shit the bed.
|
08-24-2012, 09:14 PM | #3 |
Double Dragon
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 3,776
|
__________________
|
08-24-2012, 09:18 PM | #4 |
Your reality is mine
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: NY
Posts: 2,829
|
The fuck?
__________________
|
08-24-2012, 10:24 PM | #5 |
我が名は勇者王!
|
The jury probably consisted of yuppies and hipsters.
__________________
あなたの勇気が切り開く未来
ふたりの想いが見つけだす希望 今 信じあえる あきらめない 心かさね 永遠を抱きしめて |
08-24-2012, 11:14 PM | #7 |
Fog Badge
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,513
|
__________________
|
08-25-2012, 02:20 AM | #8 |
Mrow?
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Camping the White Market
Posts: 6,938
|
What. The. Fucking. Fuck. Fucker.
|
08-25-2012, 03:37 AM | #9 |
Primordial Fishbeast
|
|
08-25-2012, 09:03 AM | #10 | |
時の彼方へ
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Lafayette, Indiana
Posts: 20,578
|
The worst part?
Quote:
Did Samsung clearly implement some of Apple's smartphone ideas in how their own line of smartphones work? Clearly. Should Apple enjoy copyright over such general ideas as the so-called "bounce-back response"? I don't think so. Are the damages fair? I don't think so. My concerns about Apple seeking a monopoly on the smartphone market are far greater than my concerns about Samsung cloning the iPhone, and this verdict, should Samsung be forced to comply with it, would set Apple's #1 competitor in the smartphone market back by a good one billion dollars. For the record, I own an iPhone 3G.
__________________
|
|
08-25-2012, 09:53 AM | #12 |
Fog Badge
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,513
|
Apple:
The Jury:
__________________
|
Lower Navigation | ||||||
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|