11-12-2012, 10:07 PM | #1 | |
時の彼方へ
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Lafayette, Indiana
Posts: 20,578
|
Adultery: Legal or Illegal?
I was reading a BBC article on the Petraeus extramarital affair scandal that rocked the CIA this past weekend. In that article, I came across something interesting that I did not know before:
Quote:
Feel free to discuss whether you think adultery should be legal or illegal under civilian law. (And if you live outside the United States and adultery is illegal under your country's civilian law, feel free to still weigh in with your thoughts on whether that's appropriate or not.) I don't expect this to be an academically rigorous debate but rather a bunch of people vote-posting with their feelings and armchair philosophical beliefs. That's fine so long as people don't take it too seriously. If things start getting heated, I'll ask the involved parties to try (hard though it may be) to graduate the discussion from e-opinions to something a bit more academically sound. (For example, someone who believes that adultery should remain legal might point to empirical data in countries where adultery is illegal if it shows similar rates of adultery to those seen in the United States, thus supporting the argument that anti-adultery laws only serve to further punish the criminals but do nothing to deter the criminal acts from occurring in the first place.)
__________________
|
|
11-12-2012, 10:37 PM | #2 |
Not sure if gone...
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Or just lurking.
Posts: 2,709
|
I think the penalties for cheating are legally tough enough already, so I think adultery law should stay the way it is. /literally two seconds of thought
|
11-13-2012, 01:51 AM | #3 |
Barghest Barghest Barghe-
|
Exactly what kind of adultery are we talking about here? I can think of at least three things that someone more conservative might put under "adultery" while I may not.
1. Where the husband or wife has an affair outside of the marriage without the others consent. 2. Where the husband or wife has an affair outside of the marriage WITH the others consent, and it does happen. 3. Where both the husband and wife are engaged with someone outside of the marriage together. Think threesome. We really cannot go into this debate without defining what adultery is. I personally do not see 2 or 3 as adultery, but others might.
__________________
|
11-13-2012, 01:55 AM | #4 |
時の彼方へ
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Lafayette, Indiana
Posts: 20,578
|
For the purposes of this discussion, I intend people to discuss #1. There's no legal trouble at all with either #2 or #3. The question about "should it be illegal? Y/N " only comes up with #1.
__________________
|
11-13-2012, 04:06 AM | #5 |
我が名は勇者王!
|
It should be a crime. I look at it from a contract/economic point of view; the government gives benefits to married couples but an affair is a violation of the contract, and goes against the intent behind promoting marriage and monogamy. To prevent exploitation, no matter how small, then, there should be extra penalties levied against the violating party. To terminate the contract is to unjustly punish everyone who isn't in direct violation of it.
This is the first I've heard of Petreaus having an affair. It's disappointing to say the least, since his entire history is now tainted, but thaaaaaaaaat's America!
__________________
あなたの勇気が切り開く未来
ふたりの想いが見つけだす希望 今 信じあえる あきらめない 心かさね 永遠を抱きしめて |
11-13-2012, 04:46 AM | #6 | |
Barghest Barghest Barghe-
|
Quote:
Marriage, quite frankly, has pretty much always been about the benefits. Truthfully, there is no reason why a couple should just have sex with each other in a moral sense, as long as dishonesty is not involved. But people have been getting married for millennia for purely selfish reasons: To have sex without being scorned or outcast by the community To obtain some sort of dowry or create some sort of business arrangement that while it may not benefit the members of the marriage it benefits other people To create political alliances To end feuds between families To evade drafts And I'm sure there are other benefits and reasons, I just can't think of one. And while people are getting married more often than before because of love and things like that, it was not an uncommon occurrence in the past for a marriage to form purely for selfish reasons and not to promote monogamy or provide a stable household for children.
__________________
|
|
11-13-2012, 05:09 AM | #7 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 14,729
|
Yeah if you take the original definition of marriage and call it a property thing, a contract, it should be a crime.
|
11-13-2012, 05:49 AM | #8 | |
我が名は勇者王!
|
Quote:
Government contracts evolved out of religious ones, and are necessary because of legal recognition of kinship with regard to stuff like property claims. But marriage benefits? Some of them are codifications of what we'd see as basic rights, but others (particularly the tax incentive) are outright incentives. Just to clarify, purposes behind incentives (monogamy/genetics) are mostly retrospective. The tradition came first and the purposes behind it have fluctuated throughout history. I don't know how the government contracts are written up, but I can infer they're done in such a way to prevent fraud, like two male room-mates pretending to be gay and engaging in a sham marriage to reap government benefits. If the government expects an obligation/commitment between the entrants, an affair is definitely a blow against enforcement of that obligation. Thus, we could infer the government is being de-frauded in a way, as the violating party is enjoying the benefits of a marriage contract while not assuming the full duties of it.
__________________
あなたの勇気が切り開く未来
ふたりの想いが見つけだす希望 今 信じあえる あきらめない 心かさね 永遠を抱きしめて |
|
11-13-2012, 10:42 AM | #9 | |
Archbishop of Banterbury
|
I actually agree with Dopple on this one, to my surprise (I came in here expecting to post lol legal). Not that I've ever thought marriage should bring anything like tax breaks or whatever, but since it does he has a point.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
11-13-2012, 12:40 PM | #10 |
Silver LO
|
I think cheating is wrong, but not necessarily adultery itself, however, if adultery is broadly-defined. However, not to the point it should be a criminal offense.
|
11-13-2012, 10:12 PM | #11 |
The Path of Now & Forever
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,304
|
Adultery is only illegal under military law if the act somehow discredits or embarrasses the military/government or somehow disrupts order in the military/government.
When we take that into account, regular civilian adultery pretty much means nothing. I also disagree with Dopple's idea that a marriage is a contract. I see it as more of a status. i.e. Single, Dating, Married is a status on social websites. What happens in a marriage is private and purely up to the married couple as to how things are handled. If adultery is committed, they can choose to divorce and end the status of married, thus ending marriage benefits. They can also choose to ignore it, allow it, or forgive the offender. The extramarital other gains no legal benefits of an affair and ultimately has little effect on how the government handle the married couple. Polygamy I can consider an abuse of government benefits. But an affair is entirely up to the married couple how they wish to handle it. |
11-13-2012, 11:02 PM | #12 |
Not sure if gone...
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Or just lurking.
Posts: 2,709
|
Actually Doppel, you have a really good point there. I guess I tend to view state marriage as so watered down I didn't even really consider it a thing. It is a sort of legal obligation.
|
Lower Navigation | ||||||
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
|
|