10-10-2011, 12:05 AM | #1 |
我が名は勇者王!
|
Why Yahoo! sucks.
Recently I've become a tad too un-nerved by "Big Brother" Google increasingly asking me for more personal information, to the point of it linking my college mail account (which is powered by Gmail) with my regular one so it could send user-specific ads from my e-mail's scanned data contents to my other account while I use it. But when Google asked me for my cellphone number to create a new email address, I had enough. Fudge them.
So I converted to Yahoo!, and have promptly realized why "Google" has become a verb synonymous with web-searching: Yahoo! sucks. Some examples of why using Yahoo! feels like a uterine Falcon Punch: 1. Poor filtering. Yahoo! refuses to narrow certain criteria Google does, in the case of looking for something obscure. Check "Kansas City Chefs". I was looking for a video in which an old-man mis-spells the football team's name on the field. Yahoo! makes it virtually impossible to find this video by not filtering out what it feels is your "correct" search. Case in point - Google search Kansas City Chefs, 178,000 hits. Yahoo!: 4,000,000+ hits, with "Kansas City Chiefs" included in the search. If you click "show only Kansas City Chefs" you get no change in the amount of hits. 2. The options don't work. If you get a Yahoo! account you get some personalization options to cut down the features jammed by Yahoo! down your throat to appeal to casuals. Spoiler: show A pity it doesn't work. Spoiler: show 3. Poor filtering! Spoiler: show 4. This is with the maximum minimization: Spoiler: show ... What a world, eh? I've stuck between a rock and the fire - Big Brother and Captain Capitalism.
__________________
あなたの勇気が切り開く未来
ふたりの想いが見つけだす希望 今 信じあえる あきらめない 心かさね 永遠を抱きしめて Last edited by Doppleganger; 10-15-2019 at 03:02 PM. |
10-10-2011, 01:10 AM | #3 |
我が名は勇者王!
|
Mortimer Irons is just the pseudonym I used for Yahoo!.
Actually though, I disagree. Yahoo! is doing whatever it wants, because unlike Mozilla or Microsoft nobody is trying to imitate what Yahoo! is doing. I will admit Yahoo! Answers, Babelfish (which is really Alta-Vista) and Yahoo! Finance are superior services to what Google provides, but that's IT.
__________________
あなたの勇気が切り開く未来
ふたりの想いが見つけだす希望 今 信じあえる あきらめない 心かさね 永遠を抱きしめて |
10-10-2011, 08:48 AM | #4 |
Not sure if gone...
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Or just lurking.
Posts: 2,709
|
Why would you use Yahoo as a search site, when that's not your beef with Google? It sounds like your beef is only really with Google's email.
|
10-10-2011, 09:00 AM | #5 | |
時の彼方へ
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Lafayette, Indiana
Posts: 20,578
|
Google asks to link my school e-mail with my non-school e-mail: I say "No."
Google asks for my cell phone information "in case you lose your password!" : I say "No." Google asks me to make a Google+ account with my main Gmail account which, for it to have any meaning whatsoever, means I'd have to change my main Gmail account's name from "John Doe" to my actual name. I say "No." I make a new Gmail account just for Google+. And then I never, ever sign into it since I'm too accustomed to my anonymous Gmail account. (Also, other reasons.) They give you those options, Doppel. If you chose to link your two e-mails, that was your own fault. Still, I do agree with you that Google is becoming far too nosy these days. People accused Facebook of this kind of data mining on people, but Facebook is only as powerful as the information you feed it. Google can know many more things about you by sheer virtue of the fact that, if you use it as your primary search engine while logged into your Google account, and if they can connect your Google account to you, whammo: they know a shitton more about you -- including the stuff you were too embarrassed or afraid to ever talk about on Facebook. So yes, I would agree that Google's antics have become somewhat of a problem; but, I don't think we're at the point where we have to migrate away from Google to other services. Or, as you point out in this thread, that we even can migrate to other services. 'Cause we can't. Google's been my search engine of choice since 1999. For (literally) 12 years, Google has won the search engine wars. None of these kids today even remember Lycos, Alta Vista, or Excite. They know about the new (and largely failed) ones like Bing. They occasionally know about an older one which was quirky (like AskJeeves) or has managed to stick around (like Yahoo). But to most of these kids on UPN right now, Google is and has "always" been the way you browse the Internet for information. That's just how good Google's search algorithms are. And the testament to that fact is that, 13 years later after Google was born, Microsoft still can't figure out how to write a good search engine. (Bing. Ugh.) EDIT: I knew Microsoft more or less owned Yahoo now, but I didn't remember this. Doppel, this may explain some things ... Quote:
__________________
Last edited by Talon87; 10-10-2011 at 09:08 AM. |
|
10-10-2011, 01:04 PM | #6 | |||||
我が名は勇者王!
|
Quote:
Even if you say, "log out, search on Google, log back into your email" that's a really tedious process, and the authentication for my college account is longer than a regular Gmail account. The password is longer and there's more steps involved. It becomes too much of a hassle to deal with, but the loss of privacy isn't worth it either. Quote:
In order for me to regain use of my e-mail service, I had to link it to all my other Gmail accounts. Once upon a time, you could have two mails services open in different windows, but in order to do that now you have to enable a "switch" so only one service is being accessed at one time. And that requires linking. You can say no, but you are also denied the service. Google took something away from me and demanded I yield information to get it back. Quote:
http://i52.tinypic.com/33e4lsh.gif Quote:
Quote:
For a brief time back in the Y2K era Yahoo! was also powered by Google, at the time I'd thought it portent to Google buying out Yahoo! a la Costco buying out Price Club to become Price Costco, then just Costco. I wonder what happened to that?
__________________
あなたの勇気が切り開く未来
ふたりの想いが見つけだす希望 今 信じあえる あきらめない 心かさね 永遠を抱きしめて Last edited by Doppleganger; 10-15-2019 at 03:01 PM. |
|||||
10-10-2011, 01:23 PM | #7 |
時の彼方へ
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Lafayette, Indiana
Posts: 20,578
|
I don't remember Yahoo! ever being powered by Google, but would you look at that. Man, that's pretty crazy.
Even crazier is that screencap of Google saying you need to provide a cell phone to make new accounts. This totally did not happen a month or two ago when I made my new Gmail account, so either: (a) Gmail accounts made from pre-existing e-mails do not require cell phone authentication, or else (b) this is a very new change in Google policy IIRC I used my school e-mail to make my Gmail account for Google+. The one I never, ever use. But I could be wrong. *shrug* Still, that's pretty frightening to see Google strong-arming people into providing their cell phone information. If they do that with my existing Gmail accounts (none of which have the cell phone or other IRL contact information provided), it'd be enough to push me off to new shores, certainly. Who does Google think they are? They became who they are because we empowered them. We made them the People's Search Engine. And we can take that away if they start trying to Big Brother shit up. Not cool. As for the Davismail thing, Doppel, that still sounds like it's your fault. It sounds like (no offense) you were too lazy to sign out and then sign back in between different e-mails and instead insisted upon being able to be co-logged into both your Gmail account and your Davis e-mail account. I admit, I enjoy that luxury with my academic e-mail accounts, but even if I didn't -- even if I were in your position -- I still wouldn't have linked the two accounts. You made the choice to, so that's your bed to sleep in, I would say. But still ... the mandatory cell phone thing ... that's pretty outrageous. Are the days of anonymous e-mail accounts vanishing? (One can argue that they were never truly anonymous provided the e-mail account provider was in bed with your ISP and could obtain your private information from them via simply naming an IP address used to access the e-mail account, but still. That was one large~ish hoop for the e-mail clients to have to jump through: a hoop which protected user privacy.)
__________________
|
10-10-2011, 09:58 PM | #8 |
Trying to send Christmas cards
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: *scribble*
Posts: 1,460
|
Yeah I've been meaning to get a non-troll account at Google for a while and the phone number requirement keeps making me have second thoughts. Google is not to be trusted with that information even if they are the least likely to pummel me with CAPTAIN CAPITALISM, at least in the short term. It does, however, reveal a key weakness -- an Achilles heel -- the fundamental flaw that allows us to turn Google's own meddling against it.
Google assumes the majority of data it collects is true. They've already announced that they started Google+ because of the amount of information it would grant them, and this is repeatedly suggested by their insistence on real names, real phone numbers, and real categorization (such as "family" or "coworkers"). I think that if Google had mountains of data on me, but most of it were false, it probably wouldn't be a big deal. So, to go with the lunatic tinfoil hat approach, just keep feeding them bad data, and make sure you never rely on only one company for search, email, and other internet consumption.
__________________
*munch munch* | FB Profile |
10-11-2011, 12:51 AM | #9 |
時の彼方へ
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Lafayette, Indiana
Posts: 20,578
|
You can't feed them a fake phone number if they plan to call that number to authenticate your account. No more so than you can use a fake e-mail address to get the password to an account whose password you've forgotten. I'm pretty sure that when Google asks for the phone number, they intend to place a call to it, tell you a number, and then you enter that number into an authentication field in your browser. Alternatively, it may be as simple as "Press 1 to confirm, Press 2 to cancel, Press 9 to talk to the operator," one of those kinds of deals. Either way, they'll want a real phone number out of you and they'll get it by holding your new account with them hostage until you supply the goods.
__________________
|
10-11-2011, 05:59 PM | #10 |
Trying to send Christmas cards
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: *scribble*
Posts: 1,460
|
Yeah, they require confirmation via phone now, so I can't give them a false number. I can, however, use someone else's phone for the confirmation step, if I'm really desperate. As far as confusing their data mining, I'm thinking a bunch of irrelevant email correspondences and search queries should do the trick.
|
10-23-2011, 07:55 PM | #11 |
An actual game I made!
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Literally the internet
Posts: 9,146
|
Wow. I've always just used Yahoo for my email and Google for the searching, but now I have a few good reasons to not switch the roles.
|
10-23-2011, 08:28 PM | #12 | |
Banned
|
Quote:
I was never really interested in a gmail account, and now I'm glad I never registered one. I just hope they didn't link youtube with googlemail (making youtube accounts into googlemail accounts), I know they did some kind of merge, but I'm not sure of the extent. All we can do really though is boycott them and petition if they get out of hand. |
|
03-11-2012, 05:28 PM | #13 |
我が名は勇者王!
|
__________________
あなたの勇気が切り開く未来
ふたりの想いが見つけだす希望 今 信じあえる あきらめない 心かさね 永遠を抱きしめて |
05-26-2012, 07:34 PM | #14 |
Pokemon Trainer
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Within a house in a city within a country within a continent. Within Earth. Within the Milky Way :P
Posts: 12
|
Also, It's haunted. My default search engine used to be Google. I log on the computer one day, POOF its Yahoo. O_o
|
02-28-2013, 11:12 PM | #15 | |
我が名は勇者王!
|
More Google bashing:
A recommended article for me (why?) brought up a beauty pageant girl who resigned from her crown as "Miss Delaware" because she did a porn video that was released online. I found that hilarious, so being curious so I browsed for pictures to compare, but Google wouldn't show anything. I noticed that SafeSearch was enabled, so I went into Preferences to remove it...and Google won't allow it. Quote:
No thank you, Big Brother.
__________________
あなたの勇気が切り開く未来
ふたりの想いが見つけだす希望 今 信じあえる あきらめない 心かさね 永遠を抱きしめて |
|
02-28-2013, 11:16 PM | #16 |
The Path of Now & Forever
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,304
|
I don't know what you're talking about. I turn it off/on all the time on Firefox. Are you on a work computer or something?
|
02-28-2013, 11:18 PM | #17 | |
時の彼方へ
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Lafayette, Indiana
Posts: 20,578
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
02-28-2013, 11:20 PM | #18 |
我が名は勇者王!
|
It's image searching. I was able to get the montage I wanted through the websearch, although it was a bit trickier than "click link, get picture".
__________________
あなたの勇気が切り開く未来
ふたりの想いが見つけだす希望 今 信じあえる あきらめない 心かさね 永遠を抱きしめて |
02-28-2013, 11:31 PM | #19 |
The Path of Now & Forever
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,304
|
So was this another space pigeon?
You don't even have to go into settings menu. They have a drop down tab that checks on/off the filter. |
02-28-2013, 11:53 PM | #20 |
我が名は勇者王!
|
I have JavaScript permanently disabled, so I have no way of confirming/denying this.
__________________
あなたの勇気が切り開く未来
ふたりの想いが見つけだす希望 今 信じあえる あきらめない 心かさね 永遠を抱きしめて |
03-01-2013, 12:02 AM | #21 |
Not sure if gone...
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Or just lurking.
Posts: 2,709
|
|
03-01-2013, 12:34 AM | #22 |
我が名は勇者王!
|
I don't know how you can be any more explicit than "Melissa King Porn".
__________________
あなたの勇気が切り開く未来
ふたりの想いが見つけだす希望 今 信じあえる あきらめない 心かさね 永遠を抱きしめて |
03-01-2013, 08:03 AM | #23 |
Not sure if gone...
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Or just lurking.
Posts: 2,709
|
"Melissa King daddy issues"
|
03-04-2013, 04:26 PM | #24 |
Volcano Badge
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Finland
Posts: 2,210
|
To people freaking out about Google+ trying to grab all the info it can get about you: information stealing, storage and selling has been going on for a long time through all sorts of means. You shouldn't be too shocked about it.
But at least Google doesn't make stuff like this happen - yet anyway.
__________________
|
10-29-2013, 08:48 AM | #25 |
我が名は勇者王!
|
Google, bastards.
They've removed the "send a text or IM to get a Gmail account" but in an effort to curb the misinformation individuals such as myself love to sow with fake accounts, they've made it so that logging in is keyed to your location. If you sign in from a place outside of your designated zip code (mine for all dummy accounts is Brooklyn, 11211) they'll force you to use the text and phone number verification whenever you use your account. Analysis shows me that this applies to any place Google considers to be a "distant location", although it still seems to think that the same state is alright. It might simply be different states that trigger it. Still, it's a dick move. And it sure makes me mad!
__________________
あなたの勇気が切り開く未来
ふたりの想いが見つけだす希望 今 信じあえる あきらめない 心かさね 永遠を抱きしめて |
Lower Navigation | ||||||
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
|
|