PDA

View Full Version : Potential cure for HIV discovered.


Doppleganger
06-30-2007, 10:50 PM
According to the study published in Science magazine, the scientists engineered an enzyme which attacks the DNA of the HIV virus and cuts it out of the infected cell.

The enzyme is still far from being ready to use as a treatment, the authors warned, but it offers a glimmer of hope for the more than 40 million people infected worldwide.

"A customised enzyme that effectively excises integrated HIV-1 from infected cells in vitro might one day help to eradicate (the) virus from AIDS patients," Alan Engelman, of Harvard University's Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, wrote in an article accompanying the study.

Current treatments focus on suppressing the HIV virus in order to delay the onset of AIDS and dramatically extend the life of infected patients.

What makes HIV so deadly, however, is its ability to insert itself into the body's cells and force those cells to produce new infection.

"Consequently the virus becomes inextricably linked to the host, making it virtually impossible to 'cure' AIDS patients of their HIV-1 infection," Professor Engelman explained.

That could change if the enzyme developed by a group of German scientists can be made safe to use on people.

That enzyme was able to eliminate the HIV virus from infected human cells in about three months in the laboratory.

The researchers engineered an enzyme called 'Tre' which removes the virus from the genome of infected cells by recognising and then recombining the structure of the virus's DNA.

This ability to recognise HIV's DNA might one day help overcome one of the biggest obstacles to finding a cure: the ability of the HIV virus to avoid detection by reverting to a resting state within infected cells which then cease to produce the virus for months or even years.

"Numerous attempts have been made to activate these cells, with the hope that such strategies would sensitise the accompanying viruses to antiviral drugs, leading to virus eradication," Professor Engelman wrote. "Advances with such approaches in patients have been slow to materialise."

New experiments must be designed to see if the Tre enzyme can be used to recognise these dormant infected cells, he wrote.

"Although favourable results would represent perhaps only a baby step toward eventual use in patients, the discovery of the Tre recombinase proves that enzymatic removal of integrated HIV-1 from human chromosomes is a current-day reality," he said.

The researchers who developed the enzyme were optimistic about their ability to design additional enzymes which would target other parts of the virus's DNA.

However they warned that there were significant barriers to overcome before the enzyme could be used to help cure patients.


Source (http://abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/06/29/1966051.htm?section=world).

Talon87
06-30-2007, 11:08 PM
That enzyme was able to eliminate the HIV virus from infected human cells in about three months in the laboratory.
I'd like to know why it took three months and not three hours. Most experiments involving restriction enzymes can be done in one college laboratory period, so either this isn't your normal restriction enzyme (and is much worse), or there's something they're not telling us. :|

The researchers engineered an enzyme called 'Tre' which removes the virus from the genome of infected cells by recognising and then recombining the structure of the virus's DNA.
Yeeeeeeah. Here's where this gets dangerous. :| What happens when this enzyme finds a stretch of DNA that it feels is 99.9% compatible with its epitope when (GUESS WHAT?) it's human DNA. And *snip snip!* there goes that guy's gene for a critical brain protein, or something. I'd like to know what specific gene they're targeting in the AIDS gene, and I highly suspect that the reason this experiment is still very much underway is that the gene they targeted is one which doesn't mutate much (yay!) but sadly resembles a critical human gene too much (d'oh!).

I could be wrong. I really don't know and am just speculating. Why? Because the article is written for laypeople, not scientists, and says NOTHING of the specifics done in this experiment. -.- I'll try to find the real article (instead of just bitching) and link you to it here, Doppel.

Talon87
06-30-2007, 11:12 PM
D'OH! :x Used to being a college student and getting to look at science articles for free. -.- Well, I found it, but ya gotta pay to read it. -.-

http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/s ... /5833/1855 (http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/summary/316/5833/1855)

EDIT: Hee hee! :twisted: I was able to check out the Materials & Methods, though! (Which is what I wanted to see.) No idea why, but they let the public look at that for free and only make you pay to read the official article. (OoOoOoOoh. :roll: I wanted to see the methods, morans. :P) http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/f ... 3/1912/DC1 (http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/sci;316/5833/1912/DC1)

EDIT2: Here's what the team admits themselves:

The major obstacle in such a therapy appears to be the establishment of long-lived reservoirs of HIV-1, particularly in latently infected resting CD4+ T cells
. CD4+ T cells are known to the layfolk as "T Helper cells" or "Helper T Cells", i.e. the ones targeted by AIDS. So they're saying, "In patients who have had AIDS for a long time, our treatment sort of falls short of the mark. :|"


Obviously, more work is required to develop a safe therapy targeting the HIV-provirus
with an engineered recombinase. For a start, the specificity and potential site-effects of
expression of such recombinase in living organisms will have to be examined. Tests to
study the effectiveness and specificity of Tre in mice are a first step in this direction.
Furthermore, the potential delivery of Tre into infected subjects requires a cell-permeant
recombinase (S15) or a gene therapy strategy which, by themselves, are still a long way
from being a clinical routine.
BAM. That's exactly what I said, isn't it. "There's no telling what adverse effects our technique will have in humans yet ..." And why is that? "... because we haven't tested it in humans or even mice yet."

Say what? You haven't even conducted studies in mice yet (just in HeLa cells) and you mean to tell me that ABCNEWS is already wetting its panties? What the f00k. -.- Way to jump the gun, ABCNEWS. :| Granted ... HeLa cells are human cells at least, so that's a good sign. Could be worse. Coulda been E. coli. ^_^;

Blastoise
07-01-2007, 06:49 AM
So, is that a long way of saying I should cancel the print order of "Everyone Had AIDS" banners?

Talon87
07-01-2007, 03:22 PM
Yeah. The pool's still closed.

Muyotwo
07-01-2007, 04:32 PM
Yeah. The pool's still closed.

Hahahaha. Win.

deoxys
07-02-2007, 03:37 AM
they said they found a possible cure in crocodile blood last year.

isn't there something like this every year?

Talon87
07-02-2007, 03:56 AM
isn't there something like this every year?
I know you were rhetorically venting frustration, but ... yes.

I think this is just agenda-pushing on ABC's part. "Hey guys! These scientists in Germany could use your [strike:76f40]money[/strike:76f40] help! Y'see, they're really close to curing AIDS, but they need more [strike:76f40]money[/strike:76f40] time! So if you're as interested in curing AIDS as we are [strike:76f40]because somebody in a high position of power in our corporation has AIDS or has a close family member with AIDS[/strike:76f40], then do you think you could find it in your [strike:76f40]checkbook[/strike:76f40] heart to donate to the cause?"

Maybe I'm just overly cynical.

Raptor Jesus
07-02-2007, 04:11 AM
There was something a while back saying Green Tea could help prevent you from contracting AIDS.

All I have to say is 'STFU and stop trying to sell more awful green tea.'